NEWS
🚨 BREAKING: Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz says children need crayons — not raids, and patients need doctors — not deportation squads. He’s officially shutting the door on ICE at schools and hospitals. 👀 Find out what this means for families, students, and healthcare facilities. 👉 Click the link now to read the full story and see the reactions.
📢 BREAKING: Controversy Over Federal Immigration Enforcement in Minnesota Intensifies — Walz Pushes Back, Drawdown Underway
In recent weeks, Minnesota has become the center of a heated political and legal battle over federal immigration enforcement, sparking protests, economic disruption, and fierce criticism from local leaders. While it’s not literally true that ICE has been officially banned by law from schools and hospitals, the state’s response to federal immigration operations has created intense conflict between state and federal authorities. �
Federal Immigration Operation and Local Backlash
Since December 2025, the Department of Homeland Security has deployed thousands of immigration agents, including officers from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Border Patrol, to Minnesota as part of a large‑scale effort dubbed Operation Metro Surge. The operation — described by federal officials as one of the largest immigration enforcement campaigns ever — aimed to arrest undocumented individuals suspected of criminal or fraud‑related offenses. �
But the heavy federal presence drew widespread criticism from state officials, civil liberties advocates, and community members. Democratic Tim Walz and other local leaders have characterized the tactics as overly aggressive, disruptive, and beyond usual immigration enforcement norms. Walz and his allies have cited community reports of federal officers stopping people near schools, bus stops, and other public spaces, — actions they say contributed to fear, confusion, and diminished trust. �
Criticism and Accusations
Governor Walz publicly condemned the federal operation as more than immigration enforcement — calling it a “campaign of organized brutality” in remarks reported by multiple outlets. He and other Democratic lawmakers accused ICE of detaining people indiscriminately and conducting enforcement activities in or near sensitive community locations. �
In response to these concerns, state officials and health professionals urged hospitals and schools to adopt policies to protect privacy and safety. A group of Minnesota lawmakers argued that ICE’s presence in medical facilities “endangers everyone” and suggested that these institutions should reject federal enforcement activities without proper legal authority. �
Federal Reaction and Drawdown
Amid mounting backlash and protests, federal officials recently announced a partial drawdown of enforcement personnel. White House border czar Tom Homan stated that Operation Metro Surge has concluded, and that many immigration officers would be withdrawn from the Twin Cities region, though some staff would remain to finish ongoing cases. �
Walz described this as a positive development and expressed cautious optimism that federal immigration crackdowns could wind down “in days, not weeks,” after conversations with senior administration officials.
Impact on Communities
The federal operation and subsequent controversies have had real local effects. Minneapolis businesses near enforcement activity reported reduced foot traffic and lost revenue, and local leaders say economic recovery could take months even after federal agents leave. Walz has proposed financial support for affected businesses, including forgivable loans, in efforts to stabilize the local economy. �
Meanwhile, protests and demonstrations against the federal presence took place across Minnesota in January 2026, with residents and advocacy groups demanding a suspension of aggressive immigration tactics and accountability for actions they view as overreach.
What This Means Going Forward
While ICE’s large‑scale operation in Minnesota appears to be winding down, tension between state and federal authorities remains high. Walz continues to push for safeguards to protect community spaces like schools and hospitals from enforcement actions, even as critics warn that law enforcement must be able to pursue serious criminal activity. The long‑term implications for immigration policy, federal–state relations, and local civil liberties debates are likely to remain central in Minnesota political discourse throughout 2026.