🚨BREAKING: Republicans are DEMANDING Pam Bondi’s resignation TONIGHT, escalating pressure on Trump’s Attorney General amid mounting controversies. Sources say GOP lawmakers are furious over her handling of key DOJ decisions, accusing her of failing to deliver on promised reforms and transparency. This stunning revolt from within the party highlights DEEP divisions in the Trump administration, with calls intensifying after a heated closed-door meeting. Will Bondi step down or fight back? The political SHAKEUP could reshape Justice Department leadership. #BreakingPoint360 #USPolitics #GOPNews #PamBondi #TrumpDOJ

🚨 Raskin Claims “Over 1 Million” Mentions of Trump in Epstein Files — What It Means 🚨

Washington, D.C. — Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD), the ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, made waves on February 10, 2026, when he claimed that

President Donald Trump’s name appears “more than a million times” in the unredacted Jeffrey Epstein files.

In an interview with Axios, Raskin explained that he searched the Justice Department’s database, which contains roughly six million items, including photos, videos, and documents related to Epstein’s sex-trafficking operation.

Using search terms like “Trump,” “Donald,” and “Don,” Raskin said the results were staggering. “It’s all over the place,” he said, highlighting the sheer volume of references.

The announcement immediately ignited a partisan firestorm. Democrats have accused the Trump administration of heavy redactions designed to protect allies, questioning Attorney General Pam Bondi’s handling of the files. Raskin cited specific discrepancies, including records that appear to contradict Trump’s previous claims about banning Epstein from Mar-a-Lago following misconduct allegations.

Epstein’s lawyers quoted Trump saying he “never” asked Epstein to leave, which has fueled renewed scrutiny.

Republicans, meanwhile, have dismissed Raskin’s comments as political theater. They note that mentions in the files do not automatically indicate wrongdoing.

Trump himself has repeatedly denied close ties to Epstein, insisting he distanced himself years before Epstein’s 2019 arrest and saying he was “not a fan.” Unsealed documents do show Trump in flight logs, phone records, and social contexts alongside Epstein and other high-profile figures like Bill Clinton — but no evidence to date links him to any criminal activity.

Attorney General Bondi defended the redactions at a February 11 hearing, citing ongoing investigations and legal requirements to protect sensitive information. Yet the controversy highlights the tension between transparency and privacy, especially as public interest in the Epstein case remains intense.

Legal experts say the sheer volume of files — millions of items spanning years of investigations — makes it easy to be misinterpreted without context. Still, Raskin’s remarks have kept the spotlight on Trump’s associations and the government’s handling of Epstein-related evidence.

With midterm elections approaching, analysts warn that the files could have political repercussions even without new criminal evidence. Lawmakers, media outlets, and advocacy groups are closely watching for any new disclosures, particularly as Congress now has expanded access to the archives.

This episode underscores a broader, ongoing issue: the Epstein case continues to cast a long shadow over influential figures, raising questions about accountability, transparency, and the culture of secrecy that allowed abuse to continue for so long.

What exactly do the files reveal about Trump’s interactions with Epstein?

Could new disclosures emerge that change the narrative?

And how will this play into the political landscape as elections near?

👉 Click the link to explore the full details of the Epstein files, Raskin’s claims, and what may come next.