NEWS

The recent events surrounding former Special Counsel Jack Smith and his investigations into former President Donald J. Trump psss

Published

3 hours ago

January 25, 2026

The recent events surrounding former Special Counsel Jack Smith and his investigations into former President Donald J. Trump psss

The recent events surrounding former Special Counsel Jack Smith and his investigations into former President Donald J. Trump

The recent events surrounding former Special Counsel Jack Smith and his investigations into former President Donald J. Trump have drawn significant attention in Washington, particularly regarding the events of January 6, 2021.

A closed-door deposition of Mr. Smith, conducted by the House Judiciary Committee on December 17, 2025, and later released in redacted form on December 31, 2025, has fueled discussions about the scope and conclusions of his probe into efforts to interfere with the 2020 election certification.

In the roughly eight-hour testimony, portions of which have been made public through transcripts and video released by congressional Republicans, Mr. Smith defended the decisions made by his office during its investigation. He stated that his team believed there was sufficient evidence to prove charges against Mr. Trump beyond a reasonable doubt in connection with alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election results. This included accusations of conspiracy to defraud the United States and obstruct an official proceeding—the congressional certification of the Electoral College vote on January 6.

Tổng thống Mỹ Donald Trump chính thức thành lập Hội đồng Hòa bình | Báo điện tử Tiền Phong

Mr. Smith emphasized that the investigation focused on whether actions taken by Mr. Trump and associates violated federal law in attempts to interfere with the peaceful transfer of power. He reiterated that the violence at the Capitol “does not happen” without Mr. Trump’s promotion of false claims about widespread election fraud, which he said fueled the mob’s actions. In subsequent public testimony before the House Judiciary Committee on January 22, 2026, Mr. Smith stood by his prior assessments, describing the January 6 attack as an assault on democratic institutions and noting that Mr. Trump bore responsibility for inciting the events through his rhetoric and inaction during the riot.

Reports from outlets including The New York Times, The Washington Post, Associated Press, and PBS News describe Mr. Smith’s remarks as a firm defense of his work, rather than introducing entirely new “explosive” evidence. The deposition transcript, spanning 255 pages in its redacted version, includes exchanges where Mr. Smith affirmed that his office had gathered evidence supporting charges of election interference and obstruction of justice. However, the cases were ultimately dismissed following Mr. Trump’s re-election in 2024 and his return to the presidency, as department policy generally precludes prosecuting a sitting president.

Jack Smith bị chất vấn về các cuộc điều tra liên quan đến Trump, và từ chối bình luận về thông tin cho rằng Bộ Tư pháp sẽ truy tố ông.

No accounts from major news organizations corroborate claims of a sudden “explosion” during a closed-door session revealing direct new ties or Mr. Trump’s “chilling inaction” in a manner that triggered immediate White House panic or nationwide outrage. Instead, coverage highlights partisan tensions: Republican committee members questioned Mr. Smith’s methods, including the use of subpoenaed phone records from lawmakers, while Democrats praised his commitment to the rule of law. Mr. Smith criticized what he described as potential retribution against prosecutors in the new administration and condemned blanket pardons issued for January 6 defendants.

The deposition and follow-up hearing have reignited debates over January 6 accountability, with Mr. Smith asserting that his investigations uncovered “proof beyond a reasonable doubt” in both the election case and a separate classified documents matter. Yet, the proceedings occurred under subpoena from the GOP-led committee, which framed them as oversight of alleged Justice Department overreach during the prior administration.

Public reaction has been mixed, with clips and excerpts circulating online, but no widespread trending “meltdown” or full eight-hour footage release has been reported as imminent or suppressed. Legal experts note that while Mr. Smith’s testimony provides insight into the evidentiary basis for the now-dropped indictments, it does not constitute new criminal proceedings.

The events underscore ongoing divisions over the January 6 Capitol attack, which resulted in injuries to law enforcement officers, multiple deaths, and a temporary disruption of the electoral certification process. Mr. Trump’s supporters maintain that the prosecutions were politically motivated, while critics argue they reflected legitimate efforts to uphold election integrity.

Claims of Congressional Panic Over Jack Smith ‘Uploading’ Trump Phone Records Are Unsubstantiated OCD pss

Claims of Congressional Panic Over Jack Smith ‘Uploading’ Trump Phone Records Are Unsubstantiated OCD

WASHINGTON, Jan. 23, 2026 — A viral social media narrative alleging widespread panic in Congress, with members scrambling to erase digital traces after former special counsel Jack Smith supposedly “uploaded” subpoenaed phone records revealing calls between President Donald J. Trump and lawmakers during efforts to delay the 2020 election certification, lacks credible evidence and appears to be a recycled exaggeration of old investigative details.

Legal expert has theory why Supreme Court rejected Jack Smith's request

The story, which spread rapidly on platforms like X (formerly Twitter) and Facebook starting around Jan. 22, claims “sources” indicate the records expose “coordinated actions at the highest levels,” prompting “serious legal and political consequences.” Posts often frame it as “breaking” news, with dramatic language about Washington being “on edge.” However, a review of congressional records, Justice Department disclosures and recent testimony shows no such recent upload or ensuing chaos.

What is known stems from Smith’s investigation into Mr. Trump’s actions surrounding the 2020 election, including the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack. As part of that probe, Smith’s team obtained “toll records” — metadata showing call timestamps and participants, but not content — for several Republican lawmakers who communicated with Mr. Trump or the White House during that period. These subpoenas, issued in 2021, were secured with court-approved non-disclosure orders to prevent potential obstruction. Affected lawmakers included then-House Speaker Kevin McCarthy and senators like Bill Hagerty and Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee.

The existence of these subpoenas became public in October 2025, when Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) released records from the probe, codenamed “Arctic Frost.” Smith addressed the issue in a closed-door House Judiciary Committee deposition on Dec. 17, 2025, and publicly on Jan. 22, 2026, explaining the records were needed to build a timeline of Mr. Trump’s alleged scheme to delay certification. “President Trump and his associates tried to call members of Congress in furtherance of their criminal scheme,” Smith testified.

Republicans criticized the subpoenas as overreach, accusing Smith of spying on political opponents. Smith defended the actions as standard investigative practice, noting a judge approved the non-disclosure to guard against obstruction. The cases were dismissed after Mr. Trump’s 2024 victory, per Justice Department policy against prosecuting a sitting president.

No reports from congressional sources, the Justice Department or major media indicate a recent “upload” by Smith or resulting panic. Social media discussions, including posts repeating the query’s text, show no new developments beyond Smith’s testimony. Instead, focus has been on Smith’s public hearing, where he reiterated having “zero regrets” about the probes.

Fact-checkers have flagged similar stories as misinformation, often amplifying old details for clicks. The White House and House Judiciary Committee did not respond to requests for comment on the claims.

While the subpoenas raised legitimate privacy concerns and fueled partisan debate, the current narrative of a fresh crisis seems manufactured. As midterm elections approach, such stories may intensify scrutiny of past investigations, but without evidence of new actions, they remain speculative.

Jack Smith Defends Trump Prosecutions in Released Deposition Transcript, With Public Testimony Set for Next Week pssss

Jack Smith Defends Trump Prosecutions in Released Deposition Transcript, With Public Testimony Set for Next Week

WASHINGTON, Jan. 20, 2026 — Former special counsel Jack Smith offered a forceful defense of his investigations into Donald J. Trump during a closed-door deposition before the House Judiciary Committee last month, asserting that evidence showed the president had engaged in a “criminal scheme” to overturn the 2020 election results. The Republican-led committee released a redacted transcript and video of the nearly eight-hour session on Dec. 31, 2025, shedding light on Smith’s rationale for the now-dismissed federal cases.

In his opening statement, Mr. Smith told lawmakers: “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election and to prevent the lawful transfer of power.” He emphasized that the decision to prosecute was his alone, based on Trump’s actions and supported by grand juries in two jurisdictions, and that he had “zero regrets” about the charges. “If Trump didn’t want to be indicted, he shouldn’t have broken the law,” Mr. Smith added, according to the transcript.

Mr. Smith, who resigned in November 2025 after Mr. Trump’s re-election, led two federal cases against the president: one involving efforts to subvert the 2020 election and another related to the retention of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago. Both were dismissed by Attorney General Pam Bondi shortly after Mr. Trump took office, citing Justice Department policy against prosecuting a sitting president. He reiterated during the Dec. 17, 2025, deposition that he would bring the same charges today based on the facts, dismissing suggestions of political motivation.

The session, subpoenaed by Chairman Jim Jordan, Republican of Ohio, focused on allegations of Justice Department weaponization under the Biden administration. Republicans pressed Mr. Smith on issues like subpoenaing lawmakers’ phone records and potential First Amendment violations, with some questioning whether the prosecutions criminalized political speech. Mr. Smith defended his actions, noting he had offered to testify publicly but was required to appear in private. Critics, including some Democrats, have called the closed format a “travesty,” arguing for greater transparency.

Tổng thống Donald Trump nhận tin vui lớn từ toà án

Mr. Smith is scheduled to testify publicly before the same committee on Jan. 22, in a hearing titled “Oversight of the Office of Special Counsel Jack Smith.” The appearance follows his request for an open forum and comes amid ongoing scrutiny of his work. Committee Republicans have framed the inquiry as an examination of potential abuses, while Democrats view it as an opportunity to highlight evidence from the investigations.

The release has reignited debate over the cases, with some Republicans suggesting the hearing backfired by amplifying Mr. Smith’s unapologetic stance. Behind the scenes, Mr. Trump’s legal team has been active, though no public statements directly addressed the transcript.

In a related development, reports indicate the BBC may seek to subpoena Mr. Smith as a witness in Mr. Trump’s $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the broadcaster, filed in Florida federal court. The suit alleges defamation and unfair trade practices over a BBC documentary or reporting on Mr. Trump, seeking $5 billion for each claim. The BBC has moved to dismiss the case, but details on any subpoena for Mr. Smith remain unconfirmed. Mr. Trump’s lawyers have not commented on the potential involvement.

The White House referred questions to the Justice Department, which declined to comment on ongoing litigation. Mr. Smith’s representatives could not be reached for additional statements.

As Mr. Trump settles into his second term, the testimony underscores lingering partisan divides over accountability for the events surrounding Jan. 6, 2021, and the handling of classified materials. Political analysts suggest the public hearing could further polarize discourse ahead of the 2026 midterms.

Republicans Aim To Impeach Federal Judge Over Secret Subpoenas Targeting GOP Officials psss

Republicans Aim To Impeach Federal Judge Over Secret Subpoenas Targeting GOP Officials

Republican lawmakers in the House are preparing impeachment proceedings against U.S. District Court Chief Judge James Boasberg following revelations that he and Judge Beryl Howell authorized nearly 200 sealed subpoenas under former Special Counsel Jack Smith. Representative Brandon Gill (R-TX) announced Thursday that he is drafting articles of impeachment, while Representative Byron Donalds (R-FL) also expressed support for the move. The subpoenas—197 in total—reportedly targeted more than 430 Republican individuals, organizations, and donors in a probe known as “Arctic Frost.”

According to The National Pulse, the investigation sought information from telecom companies, political vendors, and financial institutions connected to Trump-aligned PACs. Disclosure orders signed by Boasberg and Howell barred companies from notifying affected lawmakers, prompting criticism that the judiciary had enabled political surveillance. Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) condemned the effort as a “fishing expedition” against Republicans. Gill accused Boasberg of “weaponizing his judicial authority” and “spying on Republican senators,” calling him unfit for office. Boasberg, an Obama appointee serving as chief judge for the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., has previously drawn conservative ire for rulings against Trump administration policies.

Separately, Representative Andy Biggs (R-AZ) has introduced a resolution to remove Boasberg under Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution, arguing that judges serve only “during good behavior” rather than for life. Biggs contends Boasberg exceeded his judicial authority by blocking the Trump administration from deporting alleged Venezuelan gang members, an order he claims interfered with presidential powers. His resolution accuses Boasberg of abusing judicial discretion and undermining the president’s constitutional role in national security and foreign policy.

My Husband Left Me Alone in My Car While I Was in Labor — I Begged Him to Come Back, and When He Finally Called Hours Later, I Let the Phone Ring Until It Stopped psss

My Husband Left Me Alone in My Car While I Was in Labor — I Begged Him to Come Back, and When He Finally Called Hours Later, I Let the Phone Ring Until It Stopped

My Husband Left Me Alone in My Car While I Was in Labor — I Begged Him to Come Back, and When He Finally Called Hours Later, I Let the Phone Ring Until It Stopped

I used to believe that love showed up when things were hardest.
That belief almost cost me my life.

My name is Rachel Monroe, and the night my child was born was the night I stopped confusing attachment with devotion.

The first contraction hit at 9:42 p.m., a deep, tightening ache in my lower back that made me pause halfway through folding laundry. I stood there, one hand braced against the dryer, breathing slowly, telling myself it was probably nothing. I was thirty-eight weeks pregnant. Everyone said first labor took forever. Everyone said I’d know when it was real.

By 10:10, the pain had a pattern. It came in waves that stole my breath and left me bent forward, palms pressed into my thighs, counting seconds I didn’t trust.

I sat down on the edge of the bed and reached for my phone

My husband, Andrew Monroe, answered on the fourth ring.

“What’s up?” he asked, sounding distracted, like I’d interrupted something trivial.

“Andy,” I said quietly, already breathing differently, “I think I’m in labor.”

There was a pause, then a sigh. “Already?”

“Yes,” I snapped, another contraction cresting. “I’m serious. I need you to come back.”

“Rachel,” he said, using that tone he reserved for what he thought were exaggerations, “you’re probably just uncomfortable. It’s your first time. Try lying down.”

“I can’t,” I whispered. “Please. Where are you?”

“With my parents,” he replied casually. “We’re leaving early for the trip. You’ll be fine. The hospital’s twenty minutes away.”

The words didn’t register at first.

“You’re… leaving?” I said slowly. “Andrew, I can’t do this alone.”

He laughed. A short, dismissive laugh that sliced straight through me.
“You can get to the hospital yourself,” he said. “You’re strong. Just drive carefully.”

I felt something inside me go hollow.

“I’m scared,” I said, hating how small my voice sounded.

“You’re being dramatic,” he replied. “Call me when you’re checked in.”

The line went dead.

I sat there, phone still pressed to my ear, staring at nothing while the next contraction tore through me hard enough to make me cry out. Not sob. Cry out. A sound that didn’t feel like it came from me.

I don’t remember deciding to leave. I just remember finding myself in the driver’s seat, hands shaking, belly tight, keys trembling in the ignition. I pulled out of the driveway and made it three blocks before pain exploded so fiercely I had to slam on the brakes.

I barely managed to pull into the dark parking lot of a closed pharmacy.

The street was silent. Too silent.

I leaned forward until my forehead rested on the steering wheel and breathed like they’d taught us in class—slow in, slower out—while my body ignored every instruction and did what it wanted.

I called my sister. No answer.
My closest friend. Voicemail.
I called the hospital’s labor line.

“I’m in labor,” I gasped. “I’m alone. I can’t drive.”

“Are you safe?” the nurse asked, suddenly all business.

“I think so,” I said, lying. “I just need a minute.”

Minutes stretched into something shapeless. The clock on my dashboard crawled past midnight. My phone stayed silent.

My body didn’t.

By 1:06 a.m., I was shaking so badly I could barely hold the phone.

Then it rang.

Andrew.

His name lit up the screen like a cruel joke.

I stared at it, fingers white around the steering wheel, heart pounding for reasons that had nothing to do with contractions.

I knew that tone. I could imagine it perfectly—his voice frantic now, suddenly attentive, suddenly afraid.

I didn’t answer.

Some calls, if you pick them up, you give away something you can never get back.

The phone stopped ringing. Then rang again. And again. Back-to-back, like persistence could erase abandonment.

A text appeared.

ANDREW: “Where are you? Answer me. I’m turning around.”

I laughed once, bitter and broken. Turning around. As if the damage hadn’t already happened.

Another contraction slammed into me so hard I screamed. The sound echoed in the empty parking lot, and fear finally won.

I called 911.

“I’m in labor,” I sobbed. “I’m alone in my car. I can’t drive. I’m at the pharmacy on Westfield and Pine.”

The operator stayed with me, voice calm, grounding me while my world narrowed to pain and breathing and the knowledge that something wasn’t right.

Headlights flooded the lot minutes later. An ambulance. A patrol car.

A female paramedic opened my door and knelt beside me, eyes warm, voice steady.
“Hi, I’m Tanya. What’s your name?”

“Rachel,” I whispered.

“We’ve got you,” she said, like a promise. “You’re not alone anymore.”

Inside the ambulance, lights too bright, hands efficient and gentle, Tanya squeezed my fingers while her partner checked me and muttered terms that made my stomach drop.

My phone buzzed again. Andrew.

Tanya glanced at it. “Is that your support person?”

I swallowed. “He was supposed to be.”

She nodded once. “Okay. Then we focus on you.”

The hospital doors burst open in a rush of motion and voices. I was wheeled down hallways I barely registered until I saw him.

Andrew stood near the nurses’ station, pale and frantic, eyes wild.

“Rachel!” he shouted. “Why didn’t you answer? I’ve been calling—”

I lifted my head, shaking, and met his eyes.

“I needed you,” I said, my voice steady in a way that surprised even me. “You laughed.”

Silence.

A contraction hit and I cried out, but I didn’t look away.

They took me into the delivery room without waiting for him.

Hours blurred into pain and pushing and voices telling me I was strong when I felt anything but. Tanya stayed longer than she had to. A nurse named Megan held my hand when fear crept in.

And then—finally—my child cried.

A sound so fierce and alive it cut through everything.

They placed my daughter on my chest, warm and perfect, and something inside me stitched itself back together.

Later, Andrew stood by the bed, eyes red, whispering apologies that sounded practiced.

I listened. Then I said quietly, “This isn’t something we fix with words.”

I didn’t leave him that night.

But I left the version of myself who begged for basic care.

Months later, I filed for divorce with a clarity that felt like peace.

Today, my daughter laughs easily. I raise her knowing that love shows up, or it doesn’t deserve the name.

And every time my phone rings, I remember the call I didn’t answer—the one that saved me from losing myself forever.

“I can’t close my legs…” — the 6-year-old whispered to 911, trying not to cry. What doctors discovered after rescuing her left everyone in the room in tears

It was a calm autumn morning in Silverwood, Michigan, when the 911 dispatcher center received a call. Veteran dispatcher Helen Ward had just lifted her coffee when her headset crackled.

“911, what’s your emergency?” she asked softly.

Silence. Then the faintest sound of a child breathing.

“Hello? Can you tell me what’s wrong?”

A small voice, shaky and fragile, replied, “There’s bugs in my bed… and my legs hurt. I can’t close them.”

Helen’s fingers hovered over the keyboard. “Sweetheart, what’s your name?”

“Mia,” the child whispered. “I’m six.”

Helen felt a wave of concern. “Mia, is anyone home with you?”

“Mommy’s at work. She said I can’t open the door.”

Helen kept her voice gentle as she began tracing the call. “You’re doing great. What color is your house?”

“It’s white… but the paint is peeling. There’s a broken mailbox.”

Helen quickly dispatched the nearest ambulance. Through the phone, she could hear cartoons and Mia’s soft crying. “Help is coming. Just stay with me,” Helen reassured her.

Minutes later, sirens sounded through the line.

“Do you hear them?” Helen asked.

“Yes… will they make it stop hurting?”

“They will, sweetheart. They’re almost there.”

Then a paramedic’s voice came through. “We’ve got her.” The call ended, leaving Helen with a feeling she couldn’t shake.

Paramedic Noah Blake and his partner Erin Clarke arrived at the weathered white house. The door was locked until Mia’s weak voice called, “The key’s in the flowerpot.”

Inside, the air was stale, tinged with chemicals. They found Mia lying on a child’s bed, clutching a worn teddy bear. Her skin was flushed, her legs stiff and red.

“Hi, Mia,” Noah said softly. “We’re here to help.”

As they lifted her carefully, he noticed neatly arranged medication bottles on a dresser — not chaos, but careful organization.

At the hospital, nurse Diane Foster took over. She immediately noticed Mia’s unusual calmness during procedures.

“My mommy says I’m her brave girl,” Mia murmured. “Sometimes I help her when her hands shake.”

Diane paused. Later, while Mia colored, Diane noticed a drawing of a woman with a syringe in her hand. Before she could ask, a young woman in a fast-food uniform burst through the doors, breathless and panicked.

“My daughter! Where’s my Mia?”

Diane instantly understood. The dark circles under her eyes. The rash on her skin. Her stiff movements.

This wasn’t neglect. It was a mother trying to hold her life together while fighting an invisible illness.

Later, in a quiet corner, Diane gently asked, “How long have you had lupus?”

The woman, Emma Ford, froze — then broke into tears. “Three years. I didn’t tell anyone. If I stop working, we lose everything. If I say I’m sick, they’ll take her away.”

“You’re not alone anymore,” Diane said firmly.

In the following weeks, with the help of hospital staff, local charities, and social workers, Emma received treatment and support. A community program helped her move into low-cost housing and maintain part-time work while managing her health.

Three months later, Emma was stable, Mia was back in school and thriving, and their lives had transformed.

One afternoon, Diane visited their new apartment above a community center. Mia ran into her arms. “Miss Diane! Mommy made soup! Will you stay?”

Diane smiled, tears in her eyes. “Of course, sweetheart.”

As they sat around the small table in the warm sunlight, Diane thought back to that faint, frightened voice — and how one phone call had changed everything.

Newsnowuk

The recent events surrounding former Special Counsel Jack Smith and his investigations into former President Donald J. Trump psss

NEWS

The recent events surrounding former Special Counsel Jack Smith and his investigations into former President Donald J. Trump psss

The recent events surrounding former Special Counsel Jack Smith and his investigations into former President Donald J. Trump psss

The recent events surrounding former Special Counsel Jack Smith and his investigations into former President Donald J. Trump

Claims of Congressional Panic Over Jack Smith ‘Uploading’ Trump Phone Records Are Unsubstantiated OCD pss

Claims of Congressional Panic Over Jack Smith ‘Uploading’ Trump Phone Records Are Unsubstantiated OCD

Jack Smith Defends Trump Prosecutions in Released Deposition Transcript, With Public Testimony Set for Next Week pssss

Jack Smith Defends Trump Prosecutions in Released Deposition Transcript, With Public Testimony Set for Next Week

Republicans Aim To Impeach Federal Judge Over Secret Subpoenas Targeting GOP Officials psss

Republicans Aim To Impeach Federal Judge Over Secret Subpoenas Targeting GOP Officials

My Husband Left Me Alone in My Car While I Was in Labor — I Begged Him to Come Back, and When He Finally Called Hours Later, I Let the Phone Ring Until It Stopped psss

My Husband Left Me Alone in My Car While I Was in Labor — I Begged Him to Come Back, and When He Finally Called Hours Later, I Let the Phone Ring Until It Stopped

My Husband Left Me Alone in My Car While I Was in Labor — I Begged Him to Come Back, and When He Finally Called Hours Later, I Let the Phone Ring Until It Stopped

“I can’t close my legs…” — the 6-year-old whispered to 911, trying not to cry. What doctors discovered after rescuing her left everyone in the room in tears

Leave a Reply