REPORT: Taylor Swift Submits Formal Petition to Congress Calling for the Dissolution of ICE, Citing the Fatal Shooting of Minneapolis Resident Renee Nicole Good and Arguing the Agency Has “Done More Harm Than Good” to American Communities

Taylor Swift Petitions Congress to Dissolve ICE After Minneapolis Shooting of U.S. Citizen

Pop star Taylor Swift has entered the national political debate after formally petitioning members of Congress to dissolve U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), citing the fatal shooting of 37-year-old Minneapolis resident Renee Nicole Good during a federal immigration operation earlier this month.

Swift’s petition argues that ICE has “done more harm than good” and that the agency’s current enforcement practices are “hurting Americans rather than protecting them.” The petition reportedly urges Congress to pursue legislation dismantling ICE and transferring its responsibilities to civilian agencies with stronger accountability and oversight.

A High-Profile Voice Enters a Heated Policy Battle

Swift’s decision marks one of the most direct political interventions by a major public figure in recent years. In a written statement accompanying the petition, Swift said the death of a legal U.S. resident during an enforcement action “crosses a line that should disturb every member of Congress, regardless of party.”

She added that the events in Minneapolis “show that the current system is not just failing, but actively endangering the people it is supposed to defend.”

While celebrities frequently comment on public policy issues, formal petitions directed at lawmakers are less common. Political analysts note that Swift’s engagement could elevate national attention on the structure and mission of ICE, particularly among younger Americans who follow her work.

Context: Controversy Over Minneapolis Operation

The petition comes after widespread public reaction to the death of Good, a U.S. citizen who was shot during a large-scale ICE operation involving approximately 2,000 federal agents in Minneapolis. The Department of Homeland Security has described the shooting as an act of self-defense during an attempt to enforce immigration law, while critics argue that Good was not the target of the operation and should not have been harmed.

The case has triggered protests, vigils, and rallies in multiple cities, as well as renewed debate about the scope and accountability of federal immigration agencies.

Swift’s Core Arguments

According to individuals familiar with the language of the petition, Swift’s central claims include:

ICE has expanded beyond its original mandate and lacks appropriate civilian oversight. American residents are being harmed during enforcement actions not intended to target them. Immigration enforcement could be restructured under agencies with clearer legal boundaries and more focus on civil processes. Congress—not the executive branch—has the authority to restructure or dissolve ICE, making legislative action necessary.

Swift’s petition also calls on Congress to launch public hearings examining ICE operations, including the Minneapolis case, and to explore “civilian-centered alternatives” to current federal enforcement models.

Lawmakers React

Reaction from lawmakers has been mixed. Some progressive members of Congress have echoed Swift’s concerns, arguing that ICE has operated with insufficient oversight for years and is in need of major structural reforms.

More conservative lawmakers have dismissed the petition as “misguided” or “uninformed,” arguing that dismantling ICE would undermine national security and immigration law enforcement.

At the time of writing, no bill to dissolve ICE has been introduced in response to Swift’s petition, though several offices have confirmed they have received it.

A Larger National Debate

Swift’s intervention has coincided with protests and public discussions about accountability, immigration policy, and the limits of federal force. Demonstrators and advocacy groups have framed Good’s death as evidence of deeper institutional problems, while defenders of ICE argue that isolated incidents should not dictate the future of federal agencies.

Whether Swift’s petition results in legislative action remains uncertain, but observers note that her platform ensures the issue will continue to receive significant public attention.

For now, Congress faces mounting pressure from activists, legal advocates, and constituents demanding greater transparency — and the country continues to debate the future of America’s immigration enforcement system.